Every now and then, ultimately often, our elected officials take actions that have nothing to do with the discourse of the good ruler.
demagogic These actions are taken purely and simply to show something or to prove that they are thinking well to avoid going to touch those strings that can irritate the voters
The funny thing is that in these cases as extremely detrimental to problem resolution.
These days we have pollution in Lombardy truly remarkable achievement that we have large quantities of diesel cars, we burn coal to warm us up into the air and particulate matter from different sources.
Instead of taking action in the long term, how to convert coal into natural gas or heating to hunt sources including politicians wake up and legislate something: what is this something they do not know either.
What they found these eggheads who have salaried handsomely for solving problems?
They formed a task force to coal?
They studied to remove the bumps on the roads and other slowdowns that cause brake and tail?
They studied the flow of traffic?
They controlled the unloading of trucks?
They asked some experts to list the sources of particulate matter?
have done analysis and benefits of solutions that were on his head?
They tried if the stacks were in place?
They favored the move on public transport, for example through a day or a week at no cost?
They cleared the parking costs and avoid Km for nothing?
They checked the boilers to diesel if they do not burn oil and pesantoni zolforosi?
Nope too complex!
No sir, our people did exactly the opposite: they have decided to lower the speed limit indiscriminately on urban and suburban roads!
30Kmh in town '
70Kmh out.
Let me get into areas where the mean and V '15Kmh you lower the peak at 30?
A genius!
Even in the few sections where you can 'go you stay still.
We talk about the ring road where the sign when you see the ironic smile, while 90 grafts, finally, the second?
limited to 70!
course, there are great moments where you go more ', even those who are not' one foot of concrete is now releasing these moments less difficult.
What happens?
According volpotto duty will pollute less.
I embarked on a massive green ola demonstrating their colossal ignorance!
We have already 'seen at Aldermen that those involved in traffic does not know the car, an oxymoron of great damage.
http://allarovescia.blogspot.com/2010/02/assessori-1.html
http://allarovescia.blogspot.com/2010/03/assessori-2.html
http://allarovescia. blogspot.com/2010/03/assessori-3-parking.html
Let's see what happens to a car that goes well below the design speed (typically 90Kmh)
The flow resistance of the closed throttle (1KW?), excluding the diesel cycle, increases the demand.
the same pump the brakes (or his depression)
if it continues to absorb hydraulic steering as 90 and low-speed electric'....
ABS hungry
headlights,
The stop
fan of the passenger has to go more '
cooling (the fan 300W, 600 the turbodiesel, with a low speed and low speed becomes leech see the alternator)
alternator deserves a speech and 'excited and then at low speeds if you need energy requires it. Isomma becomes much more 'expensive' cause increases torque absorbed by keeping his W. And combustion engines pull Saracchi 'cause if they are moving very slowly consumes 600W going consumes maybe 1000 but that "cost" to the regime as if they 2000W
not speak if we attack the air conditioner at low speeds, the motor those who must deliver 2000W at low speed are expensive, added to the low yield given by poor ventilation consume three times more than usual.
Eventually KW are going in the same way that you are 10 or 130km / h, even something less than 130.
Our car starts consume more 'electricity' and power that go to replace some of those that we no longer 'need to move air (and more) that meet at speed' by pedestrians.
Eventually consumption rate varies less than expected but the road traveled and 'quite different.
Finally reasoning:
Even if you were to lower the exit of 130 to 90 V eed obtain an improvement of about 5% oil and tires are all sure this will not affect most 'heavily on the GDP?
And what about the threshold of concern? I remember that in America we have reached a couple heaps of times by 300 cars: 88Kmh + cruise + suv (they have them for a while ') + egnimistica weeks on the steering wheel ...
27 Vertical: who does not appear to have adequate intellectual capacity and starts doing the politician, 6 letters.
